![]() |
![]() |
|
Click the comments link on any story to see comments or add your own. Subscribe to this blog |
25 Dec 2008
posted at: 17:53 :: permanent link to this entry :: 1 comments Trackback link is http://www.jl.ly/Email/polianon.trackback 21 Dec 2008
posted at: 19:13 :: permanent link to this entry :: 0 comments Trackback link is http://www.jl.ly/ICANN/docnewtld.trackback 19 Dec 2008
Domain tasting, as everyone probably knows by now, is the disreputable practice of registering lots of domains, seeing how much traffic they get, and then using the five day Add Grace Period (AGP) to refund the 99.9% of them that aren't worth paying for. A related abuse is front running, registrars speculatively grabbing domains that people inquire about to prevent them from using a different registrar. Back in April, the ICANN GNSO (the subgroup that deals with generic TLDs, i.e., all but the two-letter country codes) voted to set a new policy to get rid of domain tasting. And now, eight short months later, it's finally about to become ICANN policy.posted at: 04:51 :: permanent link to this entry :: 0 comments Trackback link is http://www.jl.ly/ICANN/lasttaste.trackback 07 Dec 2008
Coreg, short for co-registration, is a popular but problematic method for building mailing lists. When you sign up for mail from someone, if there's a box asking if you'd like Valuable Offers from Our Treasured Marketing Partners, that's coreg. They sell your address to the TMPs who do, well, something with it. In some cases coreg is a sideline, but there are companies that do nothing but coreg, with online sweepstakes and other cheap trinkets as come-ons to get people to sign up. Coreg has earned a dreadful reputation. The classic example is "Nadine", an elderly woman who mistyped her address on a sweepstakes site, instead typing an address at an ISP in Texas which collected all of the mail she got and tracked its passage from one mailer to another. He stopped counting last year at upwards of 90,000 messages, everything from political opinion surveys to horse porn. So a friend asked, is it possible to do coreg that doesn't stink?posted at: 18:36 :: permanent link to this entry :: 0 comments Trackback link is http://www.jl.ly/Email/coreg.trackback
Several proposals for Lightweight MTA Authentication Protocol (LMAP) have been gathering attention of late. They all define ways for a domain to specify that some particular IP addresses are allowed to send mail for that domain, and others aren't. LMAP has a variety of technical problems because there are surprisingly many ways that mail can be sent from unexpected places. Selective Sender, a simpler scheme that has been proposed before under other names, is much simpler. ... read the mini-paper on-line posted at: 10:14 :: permanent link to this entry :: 0 comments Trackback link is http://www.jl.ly/Email/ss.trackback
The biggest buzz from the Paris ICANN meeting was that the board
accepted last fall's proposal for a streamlined process to add new TLDs.
A variety of
articles
in the mainstream press, many featuring inflammatory but poorly informed
quotes
(from people who probably
got a phone call saying "We go to press in five minutes, what do you think
about ICANN's plan to add a million new domains?") didn't help.
When can we expect the flood of TLDs?
Don't hold your breath.
posted at: 10:14 :: permanent link to this entry :: 2 comments Trackback link is http://www.jl.ly/ICANN/newtlds.trackback
Any questions? posted at: 10:13 :: permanent link to this entry :: 2 comments Trackback link is http://www.jl.ly/ICANN/simple.trackback
posted at: 10:13 :: permanent link to this entry :: 2 comments Trackback link is http://www.jl.ly/ICANN/icannauction.trackback
posted at: 10:12 :: permanent link to this entry :: 0 comments Trackback link is http://www.jl.ly/ICANN/dellkite.trackback
On June 1st, ICANN publised a short report on what they plan to do about registry failure. (It's not a failure plan, it's a plan to develop a plan.) They invited me to comment on it, so here's what I said. You can see all the comments on ICANN's web site; the only other substantial one is the one from Chuck Gomes, although Ed Hasbrouck's questions about the secret amendments to the .AERO registry are interesting, too. Most of the report is pretty good. The first three sections give a good overview of the software and data involved in running a registry. I agree with the taxonomy of failure scenarios in section 5. Section 4 tells us that voluntary transitions have consistently worked well, so there is little reason to spend much time and effort worrying about them or setting rules for them. Sections 6 and 7 are less good. I realize that they're just guidelines for future work, but they have some problematic implicit assumptions, and do not, in my opinion, set out an adequate task list to prepare for many likely failure scenarios.posted at: 10:06 :: permanent link to this entry :: 0 comments Trackback link is http://www.jl.ly/ICANN/regfail.trackback |
Topics
My other sitesOther blogsCAUCE A keen grasp of the obvious Related sitesCoalition Against Unsolicited Commercial E-mail
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2005-2013 John R. Levine.
CAN SPAM address harvesting notice: the operator of this website will
not give, sell, or otherwise transfer addresses maintained by this
website to any other party for the purposes of initiating, or enabling
others to initiate, electronic mail messages.